This is the final component of the Poster Project assignment. The day of the poster presentations you are expected to view all presentations, and focusing on 1 of these (not your own), reflect on how the information has influenced your knowledge, attitudes, beliefs or values. Use the following questions to guide your reflection. Consider the following: Start by identifying the topic and student(s) presenting. Please do not add any detail here – just name it/them. What drew me to this topic? Be specific and reflective. What was my previous general knowledge about this topic, and what accounts for any limits to that knowledge? What other questions do I have about this topic after viewing the poster presentation? Is there any change to my attitude about this problem, after seeing the poster? Please explain your answer. How have my beliefs and values been affected by the information? Be specific. How will this new awareness and insight help inform my social work practice? Please be as specific as possible. For example: instead of just saying it will help you serve clients better, anticipate a specific instance of how that will look in practice. Once you have spent time thinking about this, compose an academic-style essay, with full sentences and attention to all elements of writing. The completed reflection should be about 500 (and no more than 750) words long. You do not need to do any additional research but you are expected to accurately credit any direct references or quotes from the persons / material you are discussing, using APA format Food Insecurity In Alberta: A Growing Crisis The definition of food security Food security is the state of having reliable access to a sufficient quantity of affordable, nutritious food. The availability of food for people of any class and state, gender, or religion is another element of food security. More people living in food-insecure households In 2022, 16.9% of Canadians were food insecure, compared with 12.9% in 2021. Overall, the proportion of individuals in households experiencing food insecurity has increased by 5.3 percentage points from 2018 to 2022. Close to 1 in 10 (9.9%) Canadians were living in poverty in 2022. An individual or family with a disposable income below the appropriate Market Basket Measure (MBM) Canada’s official poverty line threshold, for the size of the family and the region of residence, is considered to be living in poverty. Food insecurity was greater for people living in poverty (34.0%) than for people not living in poverty (15.0%). From 2018 to 2022, food insecurity has increased for both those living in poverty (by +3.6 percentage points) and those not living in poverty (by +5.8 percentage points). (Statistic Canada 2023). Who is affected? Food insecurity has inflicted families and individuals from the low-income category, especially Indigenous people, seniors with fixed pensions, and disabled people in Alberta. With the rising food costs, it is projected to increase by 5-7% from the 10.5% increase. It also shows that the static wages, the escalation of food prices, and the cost of housing have forced many Albertans into more financial difficulties getting essential needs including food (Edmonton Social Planning Council 2024). Effect of Food Insecurity In Alberta, people undergoing food insecurity are undergoing a high rise in noncommunicable chronic diseases. Children who develop in low-income houses have poorer well-being and higher chances of later health-related issues in their lives, including poor academic performance (Alberta Health Service 2024). In addition, the load on the healthcare system increase is because of diet-connected sickness within food-insecure communities (Alberta Food Matters 2024) Values on Food Insecurity Food security nowadays is looked at as a human right that should be an equal right for all people in Canadian communities. The United Nation, Food Banks Alberta, and Edmonton Social Planning Council acknowledged equal opportunity to get access to nutritious food (Edmonton Social Planning Council). Present-day viewpoints insist on focusing on fairness and justice, public health, civic duty, and community engagement acknowledging that food insecurity is usually the consequence of systemic economic problems rather than an individual’s freedom to make one’s own choices and decisions. Canadian formal examination or evaluation of existing policies keeps on pushing forward the matter of food insecurity as a public health disaster. The Alberta Health Services reports pointed out that life-long health issues are the result of the lack of healthy food among low-income people, making their point out that food security is crucial for people’s overall health and a great performance of the healthcare system (Alberta Health Services 2024). Government programs like the National School Food Program show a move toward resolving food insecurity through the structural approach rather than a temporary transition (Government of Canada 2024). Viewing the site of history and the knowledge and beliefs held at the present time, food insecurity was often looked at as a matter of each person’s control or nonprofit places and not a systemic crisis. According to history, charitable organizations like religious places were the central key in resolving hunger crises, insisting on community-based local support instead of government mediation. However, Modern-days looks and insists on acknowledging that food insecurity is connected to an overall picture of social class such as low income and the lack of fairness including the increasing of prices in everything. This move is a clear indication of why the advocacy attempts to push for policy resolutions like universal income (Statistic Canada 2023). Advocacy And Lobby Groups Several Canadian groups are involved actively in attempting to resolve food insecurity and they have their differences in values and beliefs. Food Bank Alberta values the worth of persons in accessing food, promotes and advocates for permanent solutions to food insecurity while helping with the immediate need for food. Food Banks Alberta partners and collaborates with several food banks within the province to fight against hunger by way of public policy achievement and groups in community togetherness (Food Banks Alberta 2024). Alberta Food Matter Promotes locally grown food, and the right of people to define their own food system, assists groups in community advancement, cohering people or individuals and groups in one voice to advocate for a supportable food structure in Alberta (Alberta Food Matters 2024). The Edmonton Social Planning Council Emphasizes that social change and economic policy change should lessen food insecurity from the fundamental (Edmonton Social Planning Council 2024). Together, these organizations view food security as not only referring to free-giving food places but also making sure structural fairness to basic needs is for everyone. The Alberta Food Regulation Outlines food hygiene practices in Alberta, including conditions on how to store food, and how to handle it. The guideline is put in place to reduce food poisoning (Food Safety 2023). Food Policy for Canada began in 2019, it is an overview picture of the federal level that works together with provinces and territorial to attempt to increase access for all Canadians to food and maintain healthy food standards. The policy encompasses goals such as increasing food equality, advocacy and promotion of health, and safety, and the motivation of eco-friendly. Its purpose is to tackle food insecurity and adjust different governmental policies to make better results in regard to food for all Canadians (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada 2023). Canada has made efforts to resolve food insecurity from federal policies to provincial policies, however, there are still openings, like the Food Policy for Canada, that was current with hopeful ambition and had been attacked and faced criticism for not acknowledging the right to food. Advocacy groups keep on lobbying for powerful, enforceable policies for food security, and for the acknowledgment of food as a foundational human right in Canada (LawNow 2023). Community Food Center Canada Is a national organization that partners with local agencies to put in place community food centers across Canada. Their purpose is to resolve food insecurity by putting their attention not only on food access but also awareness, and education on food and skills enhancement, and grassroots movement. They also give access to locations and safe spaces where people can get healthy food, know how to prepare the food and get themself in community grassroots involvement. The CFCC insists on empowerment and togetherness, permitting the communities to grow and prosper with their own eco-friendly solutions to food insecurity. By focusing on education and community management involvement, CFCC assists in resolving the fundamental issues regarding food insecurity. The CFCC process shows locally driven answers to food insecurity (CFCC 2023). FoodShare Toronto is also a key example regarding policies for resolving food insecurity. Smotinuously advocating and bringing food assistance so that people get low-priced fresh crops to localities for low-income. The organization goes further in advocating for structural policy change concerning the origin of food insecurity, by pointing out that poverty and inadequate safety nets need government attention including stakeholders to force a change from all levels of government (FoodShare 2023). A strength-based approach Emphasizes the capacity of people and the locality to bring solutions to food insecurity. Community Food Center Canada is an illustration of a true approach because it’ empowers community members by educating them about building talent and motivating individuals to participate actively in bringing solutions to food insecurity. For Communities to sustain food security from a strength base proposition, police need to be the key players with greater emphasis on encouraging community participation in resolving food insecurity, and advancing and boosting community ability and resilience (Researchgate 2023). Trauma-Inform Approach Considers the consequence of past trauma from people who have been through poverty, discrimination, or people who have been affected by colonial power. Policies as such those put in place by FoodShare Toronto which blends together with service delivery and advocacy groups are helpful, however, it lacks the section to handle the trauma marginalized communities are suffering. A rights-based approach Affirms that having means of nourishment like food is a natural right. However, the perspective still needs to be implemented into law and policy within Canada (Springer2023). To make sure all Canadians get the means to sufficient food, the crucial tougher legal framework that acknowledges food as a human right and ensures it is the government’s responsibility to keep the law. Reference: Wikipedia. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10806-023-09916-8 https://albertafoodmatters.ca/ https://www.statcan.gc.ca/o1/en/plus/6257-canadians-are-facing-higher-levelsfood-insecurity https://edmontonsocialplanning.ca/our-work/food-security/ https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/nutrition/Page16163.aspx https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372963912_Strengths-based_Appro aches-Perspectives_from_Practitioners https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/health-risks-safe ty/trauma-violence-informed-approaches-policy-practice.html https://www.lawnow.org/canadians-right-to-adequate-food/ https://cfccanada.ca/en/Home https://foodshare.net/ Policy Project – reflection Rubric (5%) 0 1 2 3 4 5 Depth and quality of reflection No assignment is submitted or reflection is created with use of AI. Reflection is largely absent. There is no significant influence on knowledge, attitudes beliefs or values. No insight is demonstrated. Reflection is unclear or poorly organized, or contains numerous language or writing errors. Demonstrates no engagement with material. Reflection superficially describes the influence on knowledge, attitudes beliefs or values. Few or no examples are provided. Limited insight is demonstrated. Reflection lacks clarity or organization, or has frequent language or writing errors. Demonstrates limited engagement with material. Reflection adequately describes the influence on knowledge, attitudes beliefs or values. Examples are general. Some insight is demonstrated. Reflection is adequately clear and organized, with only minor language or writing errors. Demonstrates moderate engagement with material. Reflection clearly describes some influence on knowledge, attitudes beliefs or values. Some specific examples are included. Insight is demonstrated. Reflection is generally clear and organized, and mostly free from language or writing errors. Demonstrates good engagement with material. Provides a thorough reflection on how the information has influenced knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, or values. Specific examples are used to illustrate changes. Significant insight or growth is demonstrated. Reflection is exceptionally clear, well-organized and free of language or writing errors. Demonstrates a high level of engagement with the material on which the reflection is based.
******CLICK ORDER NOW BELOW TO GET THE ANSWER TO THIS ASSIGNMENT OR ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENT, DISCUSSION, ESSAY, HOMEWORK OR QUESTION*******."
